Dispatch dives into the details behind BAP's slave contracts

Article: "Why did BAP call their contracts slave contracts?"... 19 suspicions regarding BAP's contract and payment distribution

Source: Dispatch via Naver

1. [+5,589, -90] Hul... they were paid only $18,000 for three years of work. Don't part time jobs pay more than that?

2. [+4,540, -94] Wow this is just... TS really went too far

3. [+3,927, -67] This is undeniably a slave contract

4. [+3,710, -63] This is so wrong

5. [+3,350, -347] They all worked so hard to get to where they are... but all they got in return was a few bucks. Aren't fair contracts good for all of the parties involved in the end...

6. [+606, -18] Wow, as if a 1:9 contract wasn't bad enough, that was based off of a net profit. That's so wrong.. their company just straight up ripped these young kids off.

7. [+562, -13] What was their company thinking... So the kids paid off their investment debt in 2013 then they should've been paid what they deserved from then on. Instead they worked them like dogs in dozens of concerts. These kids are not machines you can use whenever you wish to make you money...

8. [+510, -12] Wow... Over three years, they made $9.9 million but all they received out of that was $18,000... are they kidding me?

9. [+435, -11] 1:9............. the adults certainly fooled these talented young kids and played them for their dreams... ㅠ

10. [+433, -13] "Their digital and physical profits are divided 1 (BAP) : 9 (agency)" ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ Are they crazy, singers live off of the profits from their digital and physical sales and they literally take all of it..

-